Now scheduling Book a 60-minute consultation→

U Visa Laws

Book a 60-minute consultation

The FrameworkBackground

A failed crime-solving program.

Congress created the U visa program in 2000 through the Battered Immigrant Women Protection Act (BIWPA), enacted as part of the Victims of Trafficking and Violence Protection Act of 2000. The program was framed as a public-safety measure intended to help law enforcement solve and prosecute serious crimes by incentivizing illegal aliens, who were the alleged victims of qualifying criminal activity, to report offenses and cooperate with investigations and prosecutions.

As originally conceived, the U visa was ostensibly designed to provide temporary legal status as a tool to advance criminal investigations, not as an independent immigration benefit. Immigration relief was justified as a means to facilitate reporting, secure witness cooperation, and improve law-enforcement outcomes in cases involving serious criminal conduct. More than two decades later, however, there is no empirical evidence that the U visa program has produced measurable improvements in crime reporting, clearance rates, or successful prosecutions attributable to the availability of immigration benefits.

To the contrary, congressional investigations and reports from the Department of Homeland Security Office of Inspector General and the Government Accountability Office have repeatedly identified systemic weaknesses in U visa administration, including inconsistent certification practices, insufficient antifraud controls, and the absence of meaningful outcome metrics tied to criminal enforcement. At the same time, extensive media reporting and court records have documented cases involving false or fabricated allegations of criminal activity submitted in support of U visa applications, particularly in sanctuary jurisdictions where certifications may be issued with minimal scrutiny. These conditions have transformed a program intended to solve crimes into one that primarily functions as a way to launder the immigration status of illegal aliens.

CitationsLaw & Policy

Statutes

Regulations

Policies

USCIS Policy Manual – Volume 3, Part C

Chapter 3 - Documentation and Evidence [Reserved]

Chapter 8 - Post-Adjudicative Matters [Reserved]

USCIS Policy Alerts

  • December 22, 2025 – PA-2025-34 – Applicability of 8 U.S.C. 1367(a)(1) and (a)(2) Provisions
  • August 11, 2023 – PA-2023-22 – Bona Fide Determination Process for Qualifying Family Members of U Nonimmigrant Victims of Qualifying Crimes
  • April 11, 2023 – PA-2023-14 – Safe Address and Special Procedures for Persons Protected by 8 U.S.C. 1367
  • March 20, 2023 – Update to Filing Location for U Nonimmigrant-Based Form I-485
  • June 14, 2021 – PA-2021-13 – Bona Fide Determination Process for Victims of Qualifying Crimes, and Employment Authorization and Deferred Action for Certain Petitioners (PA-2021-13)
  • April 1, 2021 – USCIS Confirms Elimination of “Blank Space” Criteria

Guides

  • March 22, 2022, Fact Sheet: Naturalization for Lawful Permanent Residents Who Had T or U Nonimmigrant Status
  • February 28, 2022, U Visa Law Enforcement Resource Guide (DHS)
  • December 22, 2011, U Visa Law Enforcement Certification Resource Guide for Federal, State, Local, Tribal and Territorial Law Enforcement

Oversight

  • September 2022 – GAO-22-105328 – U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services: Additional Actions Needed to Manage Fraud Risks
  • January 6, 2022, DHS Inspector General: USCIS’s U Visa Program Is Not Managed Effectively and Is Susceptible to Fraud
  • August 12, 2021 – DHS – Humanitarian Petitions: U Visa Processing Times
  • December 31, 2020 – USCIS – I-918 Petition for U Nonimmigrant Status (Principal) Approval and Denial Rates by Petitioner State: Fiscal Year 2016–2020
  • December 20, 2016 – Congress – Grassley, Goodlatte Probe U Visa, Immigration Parole Practices Following Fraud & Overreach

Forms

USCIS

RelatedFrom the blog.

Schedule

Ready to talk?

Sixty minutes. One-on-one. No intermediaries.

Book a 60-minute consultation Conducted personally by Cody M. Brown, Esq.