Now scheduling Book a 60-minute consultation→
Contact
Services · Federal Practice

BIA fraud appeals can force investigations.

Book a 60-minute consultation

OverviewWhere a fraud outcome gets revisited.

The Board of Immigration Appeals has jurisdiction to hear appeals of DHS decisions of I-130 petitions. When new evidence emerges that DHS erroneously approved an I-130 petition in violation of INA § 204(c), fraud victims may attempt to appeal the original decision. Codias Law is proud to have pioneered this innovative federal remedy that has resulted in the BIA ordering DHS to conduct marriage fraud investigations.

BIA fraud appeals are also the firm’s federal policy reform. Read the reform →

Deliverables
Appellate package
Timeline
Typically 2–4 weeks after the assessment
Value
Formal process for reopening approved I-130 petitions.

Requires a completed fraud assessment and investigation.

A BIA Fraud Appeal is an innovative legal procedure that involves a higher level of risk because case law and agency precedent in this area remain limited with many fundamental questions remaining unanswered. Until federal courts and agencies provide more definitive guidance, these appeals should be pursued with caution after thorough discussions with counsel about the risks involved.

The Case ArcFrom investigation to assessment to appeal.

Each phase plays a distinct role: the investigation produces the factual findings, the Fraud Assessment delivers the legal conclusions, and the BIA appeal converts both into an appellate record the Board must consider.

Component Investigation Assessment Appeal
Witness dossiers
Timeline of events
Affidavits Affidavits or sworn statements are part of the investigation. To avoid expense on cases that may not proceed, we typically complete them only after the Fraud Assessment confirms the case is strong enough to move to the Appeal phase.
Legal analysis
Cover letter
EOIR forms & fees
Supporting motions
Appellate brief
Evidentiary exhibits
Evidentiary citations Factual claims in the appellate brief and supporting motions are cited to one or more evidentiary exhibits (e.g., affidavits, documents, etc.). This is a time-consuming endeavor, but is critically important so the Board can quickly validate and correlate factual claims and the appellate record.
Printing, binding & assembly
Distribution & tracking

Report vs AppealTwo paths to surface marriage fraud.

When marriage fraud is uncovered, there are two parallel ways to bring evidence to the federal government. Each carries different procedural rights, deadlines, and downstream consequences.

Feature Investigative Report BIA Fraud Appeals
What it is A detailed written report with legal analysis and evidence sent to immigration agencies. A formal appeal filed initially with USCIS to reopen the case and deny the fraudulent I-130.
Agency Action Optional. There is no guarantee of a response or review. Mandatory. DHS and the BIA are forced to consider the case in compliance with federal regulations.
Deadlines None. The agency can sit on the report indefinitely. Strict. USCIS must make a decision within 45 days or immediately send it to the BIA for review.
Legal Recourse No right to information, no right to challenge inaction, and no pathway to federal court. Provides a pathway to federal court if the agencies fail to take action.
Added Value Remains internal to the immigration agency. A formal denial or revocation can establish evidence for a state annulment proceeding.
The Trade-Offs A well-established process with no stringent deadlines (unless adjudication is imminent). An unconventional approach with complex procedures, requiring proof of good cause for delay and a government filing fee.
Filed by Codias Law

Landmark Decision: Matter of Zihao JIN (BIA 2026)

In Matter of Zihao JIN, 29 I&N Dec. 441 (BIA 2026), the Board of Immigration Appeals issued a precedent-setting decision based on a fraud appeal filed by Codias Law. The BIA ordered DHS, for the first time in American history, to conduct an investigation into marriage fraud based on an appeal of an approved I-130 petition filed by a fraud victim.

National coverage

The ProcessHow a Codias Law BIA fraud appeal works.

01

Fraud Investigation

Our fraud investigations establish the factual foundation for your case. We collect and authenticate evidence, conduct independent research, interview witnesses, and coordinate forensic analyses when needed. The result is a verified timeline and witness dossiers that drive our fraud assessments and legal strategy.

02

Fraud Assessment

Our fraud assessments provide a formal legal opinion from an attorney on whether immigration fraud occurred. We apply complex federal immigration law to the verified facts of your case, evaluate the evidence under the correct circuit standards, and deliver a clear roadmap of your options.

03

Evidence Assembly

We assemble and, when necessary, obtain additional evidence such as witness affidavits. Documents, communications, media, and timelines are organized into a coherent, indexed record that far exceeds the structure of typical DHS administrative files. Each factual claim is then cited to the exact supporting exhibit, and the full package is printed, bound, and assembled to Board specifications.

04

Appellate Package

We draft the opening appellate brief — the core legal document filed with USCIS, and later forwarded to the BIA if USCIS does not take requested action. The brief presents the factual record from our investigation, applies the governing law identified in our fraud assessment, and argues that the approved I-130 petition was procured through fraud. Around the brief we prepare the cover letter, the required EOIR forms and fees, and any supporting motions, so the full appellate package is filed together.

05

Filing & Tracking

We initially file your appeal with USCIS, along with supporting exhibits, and confirm receipt. From this point forward, we monitor the case docket, track all deadlines, and keep you informed at every stage — including if/when USCIS forwards the file to the BIA. Filing is a complicated process and we ensure the submission meets the Board’s procedural requirements.

06

Reply Brief

If USCIS forwards your file to the Board, we prepare and file a reply brief addressing the government’s arguments. This brief allows us to rebut USCIS’s position, highlight concessions or weaknesses in the government’s filing, and reinforce the strongest elements of your case. This is the last substantive document the Board reviews before issuing a decision.

07

Federal Litigation

If USCIS fails to properly review or forward the appeal, or if the agencies make legal or factual errors, we help you file a federal lawsuit to compel agency compliance with existing statutes and regulations. While not every case reaches this stage, having a clear enforcement strategy helps ensure the government cannot continue to shield the fraud from disclosure.

Why Codias Law?What sets our BIA appeals apart.

We pioneered this federal remedy for marriage fraud victims.

  • We pioneered the process.

    We developed the legal framework for victim-initiated BIA fraud appeals and secured the first landmark precedent decision in Matter of Zihao JIN (BIA 2026).

  • We handle the full cycle.

    We manage every phase of your appeal — from investigation and assessment through appellate briefing, filing, and even federal litigation if necessary.

  • We validate the fraud.

    We validate the fraud before recommending an appeal to ensure that your case meets legal and ethical requirements — the same rigorous methodology as our fraud reports.

  • We develop the law.

    We have a deep understanding of this area of law because we have helped shape it from the beginning, and understand areas for caution and opportunity.

  • We are transparent.

    We will never overstate the likelihood of success. You will always know exactly where your case stands, what the risks are, and what options remain.

  • We manage the risk.

    We don’t just file and wait. We develop contingency plans for each possible disposition — including federal inaction — so you are never caught off guard.

FAQs

What are the benefits of a BIA fraud appeal?
A BIA fraud appeal creates a formal appellate record asking immigration authorities to address newly discovered evidence of marriage fraud after approval of a Form I-130 petition. Unlike an online tip or investigative fraud report, an appeal gives the U.S. citizen petitioner a recognized procedural posture, a written filing, a legal argument, and rights as an appellant.

One key benefit is timing. Once a properly filed appeal is before USCIS for initial review, the agency generally must decide whether to take favorable action within 45 days before forwarding the appeal to the Board of Immigration Appeals. That creates a defined agency-response period that ordinary fraud reports and online tips do not provide.

A BIA fraud appeal also helps preserve a pathway to federal court. If the agency refuses to act, delays unreasonably, or rejects the appeal on legally defective grounds, the appellant may have a clearer record for judicial review than someone who merely submitted a fraud tip with no formal party status.

The core advantage is structure: the evidence is not simply reported; it is organized, briefed, certified, and presented through a legal process designed to require an agency response.
Can an approved I-130 petition be challenged after approval?
Yes. In Matter of Zihao JIN, the Board of Immigration Appeals exercised its discretionary authority to accept an appeal of an approved I-130 petition on certification. Based on the extensive allegations and evidence of fraud, the Board ordered USCIS to conduct an investigation. This establishes that an approval is not an absolute shield when credible evidence emerges.
What kind of evidence does the BIA expect?
The BIA highlighted the scale and specificity of the evidence submitted in JIN, which consisted of hundreds of pages of documents. The Board specifically referenced 19 detailed affidavits, a petition for annulment based on marriage fraud, the beneficiary’s related deposition transcript, and police reports and medical records. Our process begins with a thorough fraud investigation, followed by a formal fraud assessment, and concludes with professional evidence assembly — producing the kind of attorney-certified, highly detailed record that the Board credited in JIN.
Do I need an attorney to file a BIA fraud appeal?
While you are not legally required to have an attorney, filing a BIA appeal on a previously approved I-130 is a novel procedure that is still evolving with complex procedural requirements and legal questions. It requires drafting a legal brief, meeting regulatory deadlines, and properly preparing evidence. Because this is an evolving area of law, having experienced legal counsel is highly recommended to ensure your appeal is not summarily dismissed.
What are the risks of filing a BIA fraud appeal?
BIA fraud appeals are an innovative and evolving area of law. These cases routinely involve arguments of first impression, and outcomes are less predictable than in established areas of immigration practice. A favorable decision is not guaranteed — the JIN decision itself resulted in a remand for further proceedings rather than immediate relief. Neither courts nor the BIA have answered fundamental questions about these types of appeals, so there are significant risks involved in pursuing this procedure, especially without the guidance of a licensed attorney familiar with the legal issues.
Schedule

Ready to talk?

Sixty minutes. One-on-one. No intermediaries.

Book a 60-minute consultation Conducted personally by Cody M. Brown, Esq.